|
USA TODAY - MONDAY, AUGUST 25, 1997
| |
|
MEDIATING THE END OF MARRIAGE |
|
A kinder, gentler divorce?
|
|
By Judith Valente
Special for USA TODAY
After 24 years of marriage, Charles and Lucy Rey
decided to call it quits.
Lucy complained that Charles, president of a Chicago
Research firm, was a workaholic. Charles said Lucy, a social worker, left
him for another man. Both agreed, however, that they wanted an amicable
parting for the sake of their two children. Instead of battling it out in
court, they turned to a divorce mediator for help.
For five months, the Reys sparred about the value of Charles's company and whether Lucy
would get a stake in it. They fought about their $200,000 house in
Naperville, Ill.; nearly $215,000 in stocks, bonds and retirement funds; the
Saab and the Audi; and even who would keep the dog.
Ultimately, they reached an agreement that both still say was fair. The Reys, who divorced in 1988, were at the forefront of a growing trend.
Today, large numbers of divorcing couples are shunning courtroom battles and
working with a mediator. In mediation, the couple, not a judge, decides who
gets the kids, the house, the cars and other marital assets. The mediator
serves as coach, counselor, consensus builder and occasional referee. |
"We
smooth the waters so couples can talk with each other and express their
needs in a respectful context, " says Carls Schneider, who mediated the Reys'
divorce and now practics in Silver Spring, Md., near Washington, D.C.
Mediation isn't same as arbitration, in which a hearing officer listens to
both sides, then hands down a decision. In mediation, there are no
cross-examinations, no depositions, no stenographers. Divorce mediation can
take anywhere from a few weeks to six months, depending on the issues to
resolve. The costs range from a few hundred dollars to several thousand
dollars, says Ericka Gray, executive director of the Academy of Family
Mediators. Ina contested divorce, lawyers' fees easily can run upward of
$10,0000, and the proceedings can drag on for years in court. Some couples
see more than just financial benefits. Actor Clarence Gilyard of TV's
Walker: Texas Ranger says he recieved emotional support from Forrest Mosten,
a Los Angeles mediator and family law specialist, during his 1994 divorce
from actress-writer Catherine Gilyard. "I could tell him everything I felt," GIlyard says of Mosten. |
|
Some couples have discovered mediation can
be a less expensive, less explosive approach to divorce than a judge. The
mediator serves as coach, counselor, consensus builder and occasional
referee. And the couple, not a judge, makes the decisions. |
|
No official statistics exist on how many divorces go to mediation each year.
But the number of divorce mediators has ballooned to about 3,600 from just
100, says the Academy of Family Mediators in Boston. Since 1994, more than
5,000 people have enrolled in an American Bar Association mediator training
program. In choosing a mediator, it's a case of "couples beware," because no
official licensing agency oversees the field. "Anyone can hang out a
shingle, " Gray says. However, many mediators belong to the Academy of
Family Mediators, which sets standards of practice for its members. The
academy also serves as a watchdog and will investigate complaints against
members and initiate a grievance proceeding, if necessary. A large number of
mediators are also lawyers or licensed counselors, Gray says. But mediation
doesn't always work. Michael Weiser, 34, a graphic artist from Chicago,
though he and his wife of two yeas would be ideal candidates for mediation.
The Weisers had no children, didn't own a home and had few other assets. But
at their first session, the couple argued about who would get the china, a
wedding gift. "She started complaining this wasn't working and got up and
walked out," he says. They never went back. Weiser ended up with a
court-ordered settlement requiring him to hand over not only the china but
six months' rent on his ex-wife's new apartment and substantial lawyer's
fees. |
Still, several studies have shown that 60% o 65% of couples who
mediate are able to hammer out lasting agreements. Mediation is less
expensive than a court battle, but it isn't cheap. Fees generally range from
$90 to $200 an hour. Mosten, a Los Angeles mediator who is also a lawyer,
charges $425 an hour; Schneider, a clinical psychologist charges $150. And
lawyers are still a part of the process, thought a small one. They mainly
review the final settlement and represent each side when the divorce decree
is finalized in court. And couples who mediate sometimes choose to consult
lawyers. This raises the cost significantly, especially, says Mosten, if
either partner uses the process "to punish each other, to extract revenge."
But some women's groups remain skeptical of mediation. "It works when
couples have a reasonably equivalent balance of power in the relationship,"
said Lynn Hecht Schafran, a lawyer at the National Organization for Women in
New York. Schafran says battered wives are at a major disadvantage. "It's
absurd to think a woman who has endured domestic violence is going to speak
openly and make demands in a mediation, "she says. The Reys' settlement has
held firm for nine years. Charles, 63, remarried in 1989 and lives in
Deerfield, Ill. His company went out of business in 1994 due to cutbacks in
NASA's budget. He now operates his own research consulting lab.
|
|
From bitter antagonists to agreement in 20
hours |
|
Lucy
remarried in 1993 and resettled in Las Vegas, where she is a family
therapist. Of her mediation, she now says, "I would do it again, but I would
have two mediators, one male and one female." Says Charles, "If everybody
walks away just a little unhappy, it's probably been a fair mediation." Couples who mediate must at least tolerate being in the same
room. And they must be willing to do the type of financial legwork a lawyer
or accountant would do for a fee. Charles and Lucy Rey learned that quickly.
Their mediation took 20 hours over 11 sessions. The sessions were videotaped
for training purposes. And the tapes provide a good look at this normally
confidential process, showing its strengths and pitfalls. A quiet man with
long, silverish hair, Charles, now 63, had taught physics at several
Midwestern universities. After patenting a procedure to elevate small
objects with sound waves, he and a partner formed Intersonics in 1981, which
did research almost exclusively for NASA. Lucy, 58, put aside a teaching
career to raise their children. During their divorce, she had finished a
graduate degree in social work and hoped to start a counseling practice. At
one of their first mediation sessions, Lucy demanded Charles give her half
his ownership stake in his company. Lucy claimed Intersonics was a "common
marital asset," citing an Illinois law which gives spouses a right to half
of any asset acquired during the marriage. Charles then threatened to close
the company. He told her, "You were never very supportive of my effort to
try to build the company up. I'm the one who was in the office Saturdays and
Sundays, typing up proposals."
|
"I made it possible for you to pursue your
career by keeping our home, Charlie," Lucy countered. "I took time away from
my goals. I raised our children. There's a value in that." When Charles
refused to give her an equity stake, Lucy demanded half of what Charles's Intersonics stock was then worth in cash -- $250,000 to $750,0000 , she
said. Charles argued it was worth only about $142,000. Up to this point,
mediator Carl Schneider had spent most of his time helping them determine
their needs and desires. Now he stepped in. "I don't think you have to be at
each other's throats," said Schneider, who has a doctorate in clinical
psychology. "You both need some information about the business." The
mediator listed some options: The Reys could each hire auditors or have
their lawyers do it -- both expensive propositions. Or, he said, Charles
could agree to share information Lucy felt she needed. Schneider also asked
the Reys to bring to their next meeting a list of all their financial
assets. And he gave them a form to help them calculate their monthly
expenses, including the $30 Lucy spent on cosmetics; Charles' $35 dry
cleaning bill and $25 haircuts; and the $200 annual fee for the dog's shots.
At the time fot he divorce, Charles's gross income was $83,808, Lucy's was
$22,500. Lucy spent $500 more monthly than she earned. Charles' monthly
income fell $900 short of his expenses. Schneider told the Reys they could
"be prepared to operate on a deficit in years to come" or else find ways to
cut costs and increase their incomes.
|
|
The Reys finally reached an agreement |
By the next session, Lucy had
consulted a lawyer and come armed with his demand for financial information
about Charles' business. When Lucy said she was prepared to subpoena the
data, Schneider interrupted. "Those kind of threats aren't helpful, Lucy,"
he said. "We work here on the premise of voluntary disclosure." Lucy had
also come to the session with a proposal for a settlement -- the first of
many. In it, she asked for a one-time payment of $236,000. The payment would
include about $170,000 in cash; $59,000 in stocks and bonds; and the
transfer of one of Charles' retirement savings accounts. Charles flatly
refused. Schneider looked for ways the couple might compromise. He noted one
way to raise cash for both of them was to sell their house and split the
proceeds. The Reys seemed responsive, but fought over who would pay for
needed home repairs. "So much needs to be done on the house because you
neglected it for so long, Charlie," Lucy began shouting. "Can I suggest you
two count from one to 10 real quick," Schneider intervened. A short time
later, Lucy dropped a bombshell of sorts. She asked if it were possible to
bring in a second mediator -- a woman. "There were times when I felt like
Carl and Charlie were on the same wavelength, and I was odd woman out," Lucy
said later. Schneider didn't object. But when the Reys learned it would
double the cost of their mediation, they dropped the idea. |
Charles now said
he was willing to pay Lucy $200,000 for her half of his shares in Intersonics. But such a payment would leave Charlie with only $19,000 cash
on hand, and he wanted to make the payments over five years. Lucy refused.
Fearing a collapse in the negotiations, Schneider sought separate meetings
with Lucy and Charles. Away from his wife, Charles spoke despairingly of his
company's prospects. He said Intersonics risked losing two key NASA
contracts because of government cutbacks. Schneider asked
both to focus on
what they could agree on and shelve temporarily the hot-button issues. Bit
by bit, the couple made concessions. Lucy agreed to a five-year payment
schedule. After reviewing documents from Intersonics' outside counsel and
auditors, she softened her estimation of its worth. The couple also agreed
to sell their house and split the proceeds. The Reys finally reached an
agreement that provided Lucy $206,000. It included the value of stocks,
bonds, half the proceeds from the sale of the house and $36,800 cash.
Charles kept $169,000 and the dog. "Crack out the champagne!" Schneider
crowed.
By Judith Valente |
Return to Home Page
Site Map
|